Bros before hoe’s in masculinity Essay

Although there be around custody that break the mold, the majority of custody testa workforcet never exuberanty endorse womens comparability. This is non because most men are pigs looking to degrade women, it is because of the concept of the paradox of mens power. hands as a social group are powerful and until now so numerous a(prenominal) men feel weak, especi tout ensemble toldy in relationships with women. Women face to cede the power to put a leash on men. many another(prenominal) a nonher(prenominal) men feel in control when they contrive the support of their community of brothers.Most men are not allow foring to permit their brothers wipe out by siding with pro-feminists. Siding with pro-feminists, as a male, could be seen as trying to escape from the box that is hegemonic masculinity. There has been a destabilization of hegemonic masculinity with the movement of civil rights groups, namely the womens rights movement. There are many arguments in ch oose of tinctity amongst men and women. In the past women were seen as the homemakers, that there was no need to educate them and there was uninfectedly no place in the workforce for their sex.The time when girls needed no education, because all they had to do was to pick one of a troop of suitors, marry him, keep back house for him, and live on his wages, is gone forever, for the very simple movement that no woman can consistently live on a mans wages any to a greater extent (Kimmel and Mosmiller, 1992 178-179). Early in this nations history, men were viewed as the breadwinners it was very seldom that one would see a woman in the workplace.As the years have progressed however, there has been a steady shift towards a participation where just as many women are working as men. It has also become more vulgar to see stay at home dads. By 1999, the percentage of women in the workforce was nearly sixty percent and men had fallen to somewhat seventy-five percent according to the Int ernational Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural tool Workers of the Statess (UAW) website. R.W. Connell states that there are many rationalitys why equality in the workplace would benefit men in his blindicle variegate among the Gatekeepers.For instance, very large numbers of men are fathers, and nearly half(prenominal) of their children are girls (Connell, 2005 617). Men with daughters will clearly want their children to succeed and have the same opportunities as other children, regardless of gender. Connell also states that the role of breadwinner is a burden that many men feel compel lead to fill. Over the years this has led to health concerns as a result of stress and work cogitate illness and injury.With more women in the workplace the number of men with these problems should significantly decrease. Recently there has been a surge of women in the political realm. Hillary Clinton path for president and Sarah Palin world picked, by a man, to be his v ice presidential unravelning mate shows that times have changed immensely. If a woman were to run for a position such as this early in Americas history, she would have been laughed at. The idea of a young-bearing(prenominal) president so far is not completely accepted by everyone, scarcely Clinton did have her make do of male supporters.Connell states that men would be subject to less force-out if more women were in the workplace and if they held high power positions such as goernor and president (Connell, 2005 615). People in high power positions are practically targeted for acts of violence, for instance John F. Kennedy, Abraham Lincoln, and Robert Kennedy, just to name a few. It is not a good deal that one turns on the news to hear of a female be assassinated. Mens violence towards women will also be decreased(Kimmel and Mosmiller, 1992). galore(postnominal) pro-feminist men have embraced a feminist analysis male violence against women, particularly battery and rape (K immel and Mosmiller, 1992 371).The idea is that if equality is reached in society, men and women will have more meaningful relationships thus increasing judgement of one another and decreasing hostility and aggression.In our society, caring (for children, disturbed people, the elderly etc.) is viewed as a womans business. The art of caring appears almost as a natural condition of existence a woman Being a woman means being good at caring for people. However, in many parts of the world, we are seeing more men carrying out tasks associated with child care, either privileged the home or in institutions (Lyra, 2004 3). Although many believe that women should have equal rights, there is still a sense that a womans place is in the household.These beliefs have been proliferated for centuries from the establishment of the United States. In the low this was how society was organized, a somewhat caste-like system. Now there has been a shift, but the ideas still remain. For example when H illary Clinton ran for president if these issues did not still exist whence the circumstance that she is a woman would never have been as bear-sized a talking point as it proved to be. Many men and women for that matter refused to support her simply because she was in fact a female running for president.The problem with universal equality is that one group will al ways be looking for an advantage over another group. An indwelling question for any pro-feminist man mustiness be whether or not it is possible for men to act against their own collective material interests(Douglas, 1994 33). As Michael Kaufman states in his idea of the paradox of mens power, men as a group are powerful. For as long as this outlandish has been in existence, men have had the certain privileges over women. This may not seem fair and to be honest it isnt, but it would be fire to turn the tables and see how women would act then.Would they be as fiercely in favor of equal rights, or would they do as m any men do and just leave the system alone? This is a clear question that could easily cross the mind of any male musing gender equality. The answer is not so cut and dry, this is why it will be difficult, even after many years, to get all men on board with the womens rights movement.The pro-feminist mens movement starts from the credit that men have power and privilege in a male-dominated society (Kaufman, 1994 156). This idea is a problem for many men, so much so that there are even Mens rights activists. Not all men are willing to admit that males have an advantage over women in society. Mens rights activists advertize perceived mens oppression, including selective service registration, unfair legal decrees of alimony and child support, and home(prenominal) violence against men (Fox, 2004 104).A common argument that Ive hear is that women are looking for equal rights, but everyone on that side of the deliberate seems to be perfectly content with only allowing men to be drafte d for wars. I dont wish to sound like a opposing sexist because I am most definitely in favor of womens rights, I just dont see it as a reality for any time in the near future.The fact of the matter is that you cant have it both ways. In gear up for full equality, the feminists need to take the good with the sad, otherwise it is not equality that feminists are looking for, but instead to gain the upper hand on men. I feel that many men recognize this fact and it is for this reason they shy away from supporting the feminist movement.Most of this issue lies on the idea of equality in the workplace. Let the ablest of the sex be called to the call down room, to the temperance rostrum, and whenever a post office falls vacant and a deserving woman is competent to fill and willingly take it, let her be appointed (Greely, 1852 167). If I am the candidate for a subcontract and I am up against a woman, I am not going to step aside and say you take this position because women have been op pressed for quite some time. I, like Horace Greely, believe that the most certified person should get the job.I know that Ive seen many women, who are clearly in favor of equal treatment, bat their eyelashes, show some cleavage, and flirt with police officers to get out of a ticket. The same affaire occurs in the workplace with interviews, some women will cast aside their beliefs in order to flirt their way into a job. As an on-looking male, I must make note that these women are playing on the very stereotypes that they hear to eliminate. This makes it even more difficult for men to take up the fight for pro-feminism if women cannot take their fight seriously, how can men be expected to summation?Most men are all for women fighting for equality and many will not be completely opposed to those men who do choose to fight on the pro-feminist side. There is a sense that these men are leaving the brotherhood. Some might say that it is almost an oxymoron to be a pro-feminist man. If a complete level of equality among genders were to be reached, which I dont see anytime in the near future, it would be as a result of the lowering of mens rights in order to level the playing field. Many men hold this view and this is why men who choose to fight for women can be viewed as traitors in a sense. A lot of men can feel compact by women who often use tools like sex to get what they want.It is in these times that men usually turn to their brothers in arms to unbrace the collar that women impose as a means of control. As bad as it may sound, a lot of men will be in favor of womens rights, but do nothing about it. Honestly what group with power is looking to relinquish their supremacy? The way society progresses is through competition. Most people, men and women alike, will always be looking for the upper hand. It is for this reason that full equality among genders is not a realistic goal.View as multi-pages