Natural Gas as an Alternate Energy Source for Transportation :: Alternate Energy Sources

Natural Gas as an Alternate competency kickoff for TransportationPetroleum, the oil that is refined to create bollixoline and diesel, and that as of now is the main null source powering transportation worldwide, releases too many pollutants into the air and is not very far away from becoming a depleted resource. As global calefacient becomes a larger threat, gas prices rise, and the air in cities almost the world becomes increasingly polluted, it is becoming more apparent that an alternate, and cleaner, source of energy is needed for ingestion in transportation. The best option for a replacement to oil color is natural gas, also known as methane. Today, twenty-four percent of the total energy consumed in the United States is natural gas, which means a change is already in progress (though due to a lack of technology in natural gas recovery and stubbornness of consumers, it is happening slowly) Pros and Cons. However, the important question is, wherefore is natural gas so of ten better that petroleum? To begin, natural gas is much better for the environment than petroleum. If natural gas vehicles (NGVs) were to become the norm, snow dioxide (CO2) emissions could be alleviated by ninety percent and hydrocarbon emissions could be reduced by 85 percent NaturalGas.org. This is very important, because it is the elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the aura that are responsible for the large increase in the greenhouse effect, which is thought to be create global warming. In addition, natural gas produces only xcii pounds of nitrogen oxides (NO2) and one pound of reciprocal ohm dioxide (SO2) per billion Btu of energy, as opposed to petroleums 448 and 1,122 pounds, respectively NaturalGas.org. The significance of these figures lies in the fact that it is nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxides that cause acid rain Pros and Cons. However, converting to natural gas would help more than just the environment.From an economical viewpoint, the widespread use of nat ural gas for transportation purposes as opposed to petroleum in the United States would not only relieve the Statesn opinion on foreign oil, but would also help the economy. This is because lxxxvii percent of natural gas consumed in the United States is domestically produced, which means it is produced in America NGVC. Therefore, using natural gas instead of petroleum as an energy source for transportation would help the environment and the American economy.Natural Gas as an Alternate Energy Source for Transportation Alternate Energy SourcesNatural Gas as an Alternate Energy Source for TransportationPetroleum, the oil that is refined to create gasoline and diesel, and that as of now is the main energy source powering transportation worldwide, releases too many pollutants into the air and is not very far away from becoming a depleted resource. As global warming becomes a larger threat, gas prices rise, and the air in cities around the world becomes increasingly polluted, it is be coming more apparent that an alternate, and cleaner, source of energy is needed for use in transportation. The best option for a replacement to petroleum is natural gas, also known as methane. Today, twenty-four percent of the total energy consumed in the United States is natural gas, which means a change is already in progress (though due to a lack of technology in natural gas recovery and stubbornness of consumers, it is happening slowly) Pros and Cons. However, the important question is, why is natural gas so much better that petroleum? To begin, natural gas is much better for the environment than petroleum. If natural gas vehicles (NGVs) were to become the norm, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions could be alleviated by ninety percent and hydrocarbon emissions could be reduced by eighty-five percent NaturalGas.org. This is very important, because it is the elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that are responsible for the large increase in the greenhouse effect, which i s thought to be causing global warming. In addition, natural gas produces only ninety-two pounds of nitrogen oxides (NO2) and one pound of sulfur dioxide (SO2) per billion Btu of energy, as opposed to petroleums 448 and 1,122 pounds, respectively NaturalGas.org. The significance of these figures lies in the fact that it is nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxides that cause acid rain Pros and Cons. However, converting to natural gas would help more than just the environment.From an economic viewpoint, the widespread use of natural gas for transportation purposes as opposed to petroleum in the United States would not only relieve American reliance on foreign oil, but would also help the economy. This is because eighty-seven percent of natural gas consumed in the United States is domestically produced, which means it is produced in America NGVC. Therefore, using natural gas instead of petroleum as an energy source for transportation would help the environment and the American economy.