'Administrative Problems\r'

' government activity and management remains to be an intrinsic make for shaping the educational sector. Here, it carries let on leadership approaches in dealing with the square up and objectives surrounding educators in meeting the demand of students.It takes into fib themes that allows the faculty to recognize on-going trends and responsive efficiently. By trying to escape out particular strategies it provides opportunities to facilitate educational success, draw out faculty empowerment, and parent institutional begetth. With such kinetics, decision qualification on a day-to-day prat move abouts synchronized with what is essential in ossification to school objectives and policies.This paper discernks to outline how educational administration themes are constantly utilize on a day-to-day basis. It takes into account themes cogitate to governanceal socialization, organisational convert, and confabulation practices between administrators and educators.In partic ular, the paper finds distinction and popular actions shaping action and decision making between devil administrators. By synthesizing opinions and responses from cardinal educational administrators, better understanding backside be do on how these administrators reply to school objectives and educational administration.IntervieweesThe first responder is rump Morris. He is a nous of embellish graduate(prenominal) School since 2001. With many years of experience in the school, he remains competent close Garland senior high school School’s organization and continues to align item policies in intercourse to the use ups of some(prenominal) students and faculty (Garland High School, 2007).Having earned his bachelor’s power point in Stephen Austin University and Masters in Educational political science, he provides wonderful insights on areas related to organisational culture, discourse, and organizational channel.The scrap interviewee is Linda Glassel . She is an administrator at Garland Christian Academy for almost five years. She consummate her Bachelor’s degree in Psychology and pursued her Masters in Educational Administration.With her background and experience in dealing with educators and students from elementary to high school, it good deal buoy be argued that she is competent to address issues related to administration and management. organizational CultureLooking closely at the responses make by Linda and washbasin concerning organizational culture, it force out be seen that they have similar responses about its importance in their paying attentionive schools. cardinal believed that enhancing a process of a helpful and supportive school environs enriches opportunities for students, faculties, and administrators to pass away responsive to their respective strikes.Similarly, both(prenominal) overly considered the need to recognize diversity as an essential process shaping education. By pickings into acc ount diversity, it encourages better viscidness of strategies and provides solutions to day-by-day chores (Ornstein and Lunenberg, 2007).On the early(a) hand, Linda and merchantman buoy opinions diverge when they talk about how to deal with residence and professional excellence. Here, it butt joint be seen that Linda sees the need to constantly motivate people to depart responsible and accountable to their respective roles deep down the school.It is through this process that they prat cave in up and become adaptive to change and abide with specific and apt(p) standards. If at that place are existing remainders, it gives easier marrow to resolve issues and conform to the norms provided.In contrast, John sees this routine conundrum as part of the role and right of an educator and administrator. He believes that since standards and expectations are given accordingly, for each one one moldiness be keen and responsible enough to dish according to these parameters. H ere, John sees the issue as to a greater extent(prenominal) of an individual endeavor compared to Linda’s perspective that it must be a collective process.Organizational ChangeAssessing the responses made by John and Linda with regards to organizational change, it scum bag be seen that their opinions take for on the idea that change is essential.They both see it as an opportunity to grow and function in accordance to the ever-changing needs of their respective schools. Since organizational change can induce varied responses among members of the school, it is and so crucial to clearly identify these apologys so suspend attention can be made (Ornstein and Lunenberg, 2007).Likewise, Linda and John as well as believed that addressing problems of organizational change on a day-after-day basis means incorporating aims and objectives by administrators. By advocating these policies, administrative problems can be projected and addressed in a more efficient manner.On the ot her hand, the main struggle between John and Linda’s responses splay around specific mechanisms that can be utilise to address organizational tube and accountability problems. Specifically, Linda is more of a facilitative type, seeking to interact and develop an environment where teachers feel comfortable in their take to the woods and responsibility.She believes that this would then provide the necessary means to infuse better means to devote better reaction and feedback from employees.On the contrary, John seeks to pad colloquy lines and openness among his people. He believes that resistance only happens because individuals do not see the bigger picture or exactly too comfortable with the original apparatus of things. However, by bridging these gaps on a daily basis, educators and administrators can fully understand the patch and prevent confusions from happening.CommunicationThe last area discussed with the interviewees spread outs around administrative problems related to confabulation. Here, Linda and John were asked specific questions on their perspective and opinions on how this problem can be solved daily and what specific means are lendable that each one can utilize.Reviewing the responses made by the two, it can be seen that their similarities revolve around the recognition that conflict is inevitable in any organization. Likewise, both also believed that resolving conflict, miscommunication, and other hurdles in communication would mean generateing specific dynamics that opens up and diversifies how people interact both formally and informally.Again, like the previous two questions, Linda and John differ in their capableness to apply these changes in their schools. Since their respective educational environments vary in specific patterns of communication and level of professionalism, the methods used to address conflict and resolve issues are also variant.For example, Linda argued the need to create an environment of openness and respect other people’s opinions concerning a specific issue. This would then help confines miscommunication and development of factions within the school.On the other hand, since John’s scope and responsibility is a great deal bigger compared to Linda, he sees the need to establish appropriate protocols and rules that teachers should follow. By developing a standard on how people can communicate, it can help establish a professional and responsible means to interact. Also, it can be argued that this is his solution on communication problems in his school on a daily basis.Analysis of Inputs and Responses from IntervieweesSummarizing the whole of the interview process, Linda Glassel and John Morris provided significant feedback of how administrators operate on educational issues related to their field. Here, it can be seen that each one provided ideas, opinions, and experiences on how they manage and shape up administrative goals in their respective schools.Assess ing their responses, it can be seen that similarities are apparent in the manner on how leadership, responsibility, and open communication remains crucial in addressing organizational culture, organizational change, and communication (Refer to Appendix for more details). Each one believed that these principles help administrators become responsive with daily issues revolving around their practice.On the other hand, distinctions can also be seen in the way Linda and John provided specific means of how the three elements can be addressed. It can be argued that since organizations vary according to culture as well as organizational dynamics, administrators must look into means to unify their capabilities to ensure that administrative functions are met effectively (Fiore, 2004).That is why the strategies elaborated by the two interviewees correspond to what their organization needs. Also, such depart goes to translate how subjective and circumstantial the process of educational admi nistration is. That is why administrators must be keen to analyze and determine situations within their jurisdiction so that appropriate actions related to leadership and communication can be established (Musella and Davis, 1991).ConclusionOverall, the replies made by both Linda and John showcase the different dynamics involved in educational administration. Though their answers may vary in some aspects, both have determine important precepts that looks into enhancing communication, the importance of leadership and reinforcing responsibility.By taking into account daily administrative problems, it goes to show the value of decision making and strategies used by administrators in resolving the issue.ReferencesFiore, D.J. (2004) demonstration to educational administration: standards, theories, and practice.(US: Eye on Education).Garland Christian Academy. (2009) Mission Statement. Retrieved fromhttp://www.garlandchristian.com/about-gca/mission-statement/Garland High School. (2007) Administration. Retrieved fromHelping Pauline Face Her Sister DeathMusella, D. and Davis, J. (1991) Chapter 12: Assessing Organizational Culture: Implications forLeaders in Organizational Change. Understanding school administration issues: studies of the contemporaneous chief education officer. eds. Kenneth Leithwood and Donald Musella. (US: Routledege).Ornstein, A.C. and Lunenburg, F.C. (2007) Educational Administration: Concepts andPractices. (US: Cengage Learning).\r\n'